[julie01]

It looks good but if you add some more bright colors then it will be even better.

[Francis Simisim]

@Julie: thanks or the tip, that's why Ive felt there's something missing

[jonathanfigaro]

Great website!

[BALLERMODE]

Hey Francis-

I hope you take this as constructive criticism, as I mean no disrespect. I know how hard it is to execute an idea and how much time you can end up spending on it.

As someone who has bought some pricey watches over the years, ranging from $1000 to $20,000 a piece, I have to say- I would not read your website. You are targeting an audience, such as myself, that buys higher quality and higher priced watches. Though, I won't say I won't look for a good price, I WILL say I won't be clicking on any Google ads to find it. By you placing Google ads on your site, you are telling me you are only trying to make money by people clicking on the ads. That's cool and everything but, to me, it might translate into the idea that you are putting information on the site that a) isn't your own opinion (i.e. copied from another site) or b) may not be of high quality/reliable content.

You state that you are against replica watches, however your ads point me to replica watch sites. replica-faux.com/ is one of them.

If watches are your passion, along with making money, I would suggest signing up as an affiliate with a larger site(s) and make your money off referrals. Then either link your blogs to their site using your custom URL, or use referral codes. Also, the blogspot blogs all look generic and spammy. Look into a Flash blog. If you need some ideas where to get something really cool looking for cheap, let me know- I can point you in a good direction to start.

Good luck.

-NV-

[Francis Simisim]

@Ballermode: Thank you so much for the deep review, I really appreciate constructive criticism as it would really help me out. Actually right now, I've developed it for the purpose of having a minisite, you'll notice that most of the contents are not that great as it is generally for SEO as opposed to deep contents (although I did spend quite some time with it).

I'm thinking of great ideas that could be implemented on that domain name, any suggestions?

THanks again for the review, I really appreciate it