+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Ads by Google
  1. #1
    clabrat is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    66

    Post Salary vs Hourly Employee

    Difference between the hourly role and salary role
    It is a common feature in the US to have both hourly role and salary role in the working system. Salary role is a traditional way and covered a lot of worker benefits. However the hourly role is preferred where the company sees its application viable. A work that requires a few moments and is finished may not require a full day salary role employee. Thus a comp-any will look for an hourly role employee. Over 2 million working Americans expected to loose their jobs; meaning they will have to adapt to the available part-time jobs as the hourly role employees. Massive employee layoff however is putting the security guarantee for the salary associated jobs at risk. It is more depressing for a salary role employee to loose his job than an hourly role worker to loose his particular job. It is a custom for many hourly role workers that they will source for more than one company to work with in stipulated time of the day. Here the worker moves from one company to another working for a set hour of time. This is more secure in this time of economic uncertainty.

    Hourly role benefits to companies
    An estimated 9.7% workers are expected to lose their jobs in the US. This means that companies are lying off of workers. Some are considering going for the hourly paid workers. They usually posses the benefit of great output compared to the salaried. They work on targets and work load. The more load they work the better the pay. This is more favourable to companies looking for strict cost cutting strategies.

    Hourly role benefits to workers
    Workers are normally paid on work done. The more work they do the more they get paid. It has set targets. Workers program their tasks so that they can work in more companies. It allows flexibility of the worker. Workers are more disciplined and if they manage to work for many companies they are able to get higher returns as wages.

    Salary role benefits to companies
    Usually a company will enjoy the full application and benefits of an employee’s skill set. Thus a company has better competitive edge if its employee’s skills are superior to its competitors. However the company has to pay for this in terms of working benefit schemes.

    Salary role worker; a liability to the company
    It is not always beneficial for the company to have the salary role employee. At this time of economic melt down companies are paying the price. They have employee they cannot hold any more though they have employed them for years. Thus they have to lay them down and offer them a very untimely lay off package. This shows the difference of salary roles and hourly roles in a company staff strategy.
    John Traveler
    Eight Hour Journey.com - Your guide to climbing the Corporate Ladder.
    Visit: http://www.EightHourJourney.com

  2. #2
    paybenefits is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1
    Yeah,i agree that, hourly rates are beneficial for the companies.
    Thanks and regards
    Taurusquest
    Thanks and regards
    paybenefits

  3. #3
    ciaossu is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    146
    I am not sure I can agree with this argument as its a case by case basis and it doesn't speak for the majority of companies out there. From personal experience, as a company we still prefer salary employees. There is no substantial proof that a salary employee's work can not be measured accurately or that their output is not comparable to that of an hourly employee. It can be done depending on how the company operates.

    That said, the only true difference is how the employee is paid. The actual work and the benefits, flexibility, and liability play very little role. Your argument assumes that all companies is experiencing the same effect and is also suffering from the current economy. I disagree as its not a one size fit all situation and there are many thriving companies that do not have the same issues you presented in your argument, ours being one of them. In fact, it is a huge advantage for us to put employees on salary rather than pay them hourly.

    Again, its a case by case situation and I don't think that the "general" company necessarily apply to your argument either.
    --------------------------------------
    My Entrepreneur Blog

  4. #4
    myfayt is offline YE Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    597
    Salary means you can get more work out of an employee where they don't get paid for it.

  5. #5
    aliendavid's Avatar
    aliendavid is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Guangzhou, China
    Posts
    26
    and if they are lazy and drag things on?

  6. #6
    ciaossu is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    146
    Thats what reviews and set metric expectations is for. If they don't perform the necessity for their position, you naturally fire them. I have yet to have that issue
    --------------------------------------
    My Entrepreneur Blog

  7. #7
    SmallVolume's Avatar
    SmallVolume is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    70
    Good article, in fact I love hourly work not salary work. But it seems there's no so much hourly work suitable to do in our country.

Ads by Google

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Untitled Document
YoungEntrepreneur Logo Featured on: Business Week About Alltop Wall Street Journal

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy


SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC3