Ethics in Business and Consumers
So last night a friend and I got into a heated debate around 2 a.m. and lasted almost till 5 a.m. and I was just wondering some other people's perspectives on the issue ( we are both web developers as well )...
GreaseMonkey ( a FireFox Extension ) has a plug-in which allows you to strip the advertisements off of MySpace and FaceBook... now we both agree that this is innovative and does get rid of the annoying Flash ads... I mentioned to him that I have an issue with the software...
When you sign up for and use Myspace, you agree to their Terms of Service(ToS), and in exhange for their free service are served ads with each page. Now the ads still get served and then get stripped client side, so the advertiser is still charged for the impressions that are never displayed.
His arguments included that although he agreed to the ToS, he thought that MySpace was "abusing their power" by showing too many distracting ads, and that he should be able to ignore "unfair" parts of a ToS, or even a contract if he deemed particular pieces unfair. His argument was that he was never going to click an ad anyways. I basically told him that if he was unhappy with MySpace's amount of ads, concern for profit, or site in general, then he could move to another social networking site... or better yet make his own without ads, he seemed to think that MySpace was a right, instead of a privilege, because it had control over aspects of his social life.
Long story short, is it wrong to strip the ads from FaceBook, or MySpace, when they are providing you with a free service and charging an advertiser instead of you?
|