In a break even analysis is it bad that one product doesn't reach the break even point and comes out negative? For example, say you are selling two products. One product sells for $2 and the other sells for $10. The one that sells for $2 and goes negative doesn't reach break-even but the one that sells for $10 reaches way over break-even and can pay for the $2 products negative sales. The net profits still come out positive by a good amount. Now the question again is, is it fine to have one product that goes negative be compensated by another product that goes way above break even?





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote

Featured on: