<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama or McCain &#8211; Who is More Small Business Friendly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:18:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jynell</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-137583</link>
		<dc:creator>jynell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-137583</guid>
		<description>Well, by now, we all know it is O&#039;Bama.  Hope the stimulus $$ work or we may be great trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, by now, we all know it is O&#8217;Bama.  Hope the stimulus $$ work or we may be great trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-105912</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-105912</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s tax plan will destroy the Social Security system.

Obama says his income tax plan will lower taxes for 95% of Americans.  There is just one problem with this, 40% of Americans already pay no income tax.  Obama&#039;s response to this is that these people pay Social Security tax.  Well, that&#039;s not income tax, but a contribution to their retirement plan.  So if he wins and implements his tax plan, for the first time in the history of Social Security, 40% of the people who will get retirement benefits will have paid nothing for them.  Social Security will then loose all pretext of being a retirement plan, and will become a national welfare program.

This will cause Social Security to lose public support in a massive way. Leave Social Security contributions out of income tax plans.  If you take some peoples income taxes to pay others Social Security taxes, Social Security will be destroyed forever.

http://strategicthought-charles77.blogspot.com/2008/10/obamas-tax-plan-will-destroy-social.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s tax plan will destroy the Social Security system.</p>
<p>Obama says his income tax plan will lower taxes for 95% of Americans.  There is just one problem with this, 40% of Americans already pay no income tax.  Obama&#8217;s response to this is that these people pay Social Security tax.  Well, that&#8217;s not income tax, but a contribution to their retirement plan.  So if he wins and implements his tax plan, for the first time in the history of Social Security, 40% of the people who will get retirement benefits will have paid nothing for them.  Social Security will then loose all pretext of being a retirement plan, and will become a national welfare program.</p>
<p>This will cause Social Security to lose public support in a massive way. Leave Social Security contributions out of income tax plans.  If you take some peoples income taxes to pay others Social Security taxes, Social Security will be destroyed forever.</p>
<p><a href="http://strategicthought-charles77.blogspot.com/2008/10/obamas-tax-plan-will-destroy-social.html" rel="nofollow">http://strategicthought-charles77.blogspot.com/2008/10/obamas-tax-plan-will-destroy-social.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarenW</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-104428</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-104428</guid>
		<description>bryan, 

Actually the bill that McCain co-sponsored was not until 2006, when it was clear it was going nowhere, and it only would have removed all SEC regulation and put in a private advisory board. S 190.  The republicans controlled the Senate at that time, it passed committee and never got a vote, but at best it was rearranging chairs on the Titanic.

However, all of the bad mortgages did not cause this mess.  A this is a huge mess, look up credit default swaps, http://www.opednews.com/articles/CREDIT-DEFAULT-SWAPS--THE-by-Chuck-Simpson-080924-49.html basically some banks became holding companies and decided to insure mortgages, sounds great, if the buyer doesn&#039;t pay, the bank is covered with insurance, and it likely would have been fine, except anyone and everyone was allowed to pay the premium and collect if a mortgage failed, thousands of people betting against each mortgage. It is the insurance portions of these banks that have broken them, not the mortgage portions.

Make no mistake it was deregulation that started this fiasco, starting with the Gramm/Leach/Bliley Act in 1999
http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Nov/1/127845.html Which allowed banks back into the insurance business if they became holding companies, and was furthered by the Commodities Futures Modernization act of 2000, which allowed them to call insurance swaps, and not be regulated as insurance, thus allowing them to sell multiple policies on the same mortgage.  

It is like the mortgages were a drip, and someone decided to go in and cut the faucet off of the pipe and walk away. Since you seem to be a fairly partisan fellow, I am going to point out here that from 2004 until 2006 republicans controlled the house, the senate, and the white house and we know that there were problems because they did hold hearings, and still nothing at all was done.  

And knowing your revenue doesn&#039;t give me any idea where you will stand under the Obama tax plan.  Nothing is based on revenue, it is all based on net.  What is left after expenses and deductions.  You can check out the chart here if you are really interested:   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/09/ST2008060900950.html

Also, the McCain plan will cut taxes for large corporations that often compete with and squash small businesses, no one is considering that, or that the McCain plan will tax health insurance premiums as income for the employee, so I assume that it would increase what both the employee and the employeer are paying in for social security, as that is based on the income of the employee, and  you match what they pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bryan, </p>
<p>Actually the bill that McCain co-sponsored was not until 2006, when it was clear it was going nowhere, and it only would have removed all SEC regulation and put in a private advisory board. S 190.  The republicans controlled the Senate at that time, it passed committee and never got a vote, but at best it was rearranging chairs on the Titanic.</p>
<p>However, all of the bad mortgages did not cause this mess.  A this is a huge mess, look up credit default swaps, <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/CREDIT-DEFAULT-SWAPS--THE-by-Chuck-Simpson-080924-49.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.opednews.com/articles/CREDIT-DEFAULT-SWAPS&#8211;THE-by-Chuck-Simpson-080924-49.html</a> basically some banks became holding companies and decided to insure mortgages, sounds great, if the buyer doesn&#8217;t pay, the bank is covered with insurance, and it likely would have been fine, except anyone and everyone was allowed to pay the premium and collect if a mortgage failed, thousands of people betting against each mortgage. It is the insurance portions of these banks that have broken them, not the mortgage portions.</p>
<p>Make no mistake it was deregulation that started this fiasco, starting with the Gramm/Leach/Bliley Act in 1999<br />
<a href="http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Nov/1/127845.html" rel="nofollow">http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Nov/1/127845.html</a> Which allowed banks back into the insurance business if they became holding companies, and was furthered by the Commodities Futures Modernization act of 2000, which allowed them to call insurance swaps, and not be regulated as insurance, thus allowing them to sell multiple policies on the same mortgage.  </p>
<p>It is like the mortgages were a drip, and someone decided to go in and cut the faucet off of the pipe and walk away. Since you seem to be a fairly partisan fellow, I am going to point out here that from 2004 until 2006 republicans controlled the house, the senate, and the white house and we know that there were problems because they did hold hearings, and still nothing at all was done.  </p>
<p>And knowing your revenue doesn&#8217;t give me any idea where you will stand under the Obama tax plan.  Nothing is based on revenue, it is all based on net.  What is left after expenses and deductions.  You can check out the chart here if you are really interested:   <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/09/ST2008060900950.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/09/ST2008060900950.html</a></p>
<p>Also, the McCain plan will cut taxes for large corporations that often compete with and squash small businesses, no one is considering that, or that the McCain plan will tax health insurance premiums as income for the employee, so I assume that it would increase what both the employee and the employeer are paying in for social security, as that is based on the income of the employee, and  you match what they pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-103057</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-103057</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t unbridled capitalism, but government intervention that forced the government sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to take on ill-advised loans and then resell them to Wall Street:
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=M2QwNDhkZTg2OGYzZjkzM2E2NDEwM2U5OGVkNTc0YzU

What is Obama&#039;s plan for businesses generating more than $600k in revenue (as my small business that employs 13 people does)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t unbridled capitalism, but government intervention that forced the government sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to take on ill-advised loans and then resell them to Wall Street:<br />
<a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=M2QwNDhkZTg2OGYzZjkzM2E2NDEwM2U5OGVkNTc0YzU" rel="nofollow">http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=M2QwNDhkZTg2OGYzZjkzM2E2NDEwM2U5OGVkNTc0YzU</a></p>
<p>What is Obama&#8217;s plan for businesses generating more than $600k in revenue (as my small business that employs 13 people does)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: line by line</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-100720</link>
		<dc:creator>line by line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-100720</guid>
		<description>Lets go line by line

The goal is to move the economy forward today

Obama

Increase the minimum wage and index the rate to inflation so that it goes up every year 

This helps employees and costs small bussiness. - This is a negative to Small business

Wants to eliminate all capital gains taxes for new business start-ups 

Great - But how does this help the economy today? 95% of small businesses fail in 3-5 years. We need to help the small businesses that exist today to grow. - This is good but not effective for results now.

Give a $500 credit to business owners to offset the self-employment tax 

I&#039;ll take the $500, but if you own a small business how is $500 going to help you really?

Proposes making the R&amp;D tax credit system permanent.

While this is good, I dont know many small businesses wih R&amp;D.  This is not a change only to make permanent.
 
Give a 50% refundable credit for employee health insurance premiums that are paid by the employer 

This is positive... for those that offer health benefits and motivates others to offer health benefits.

Suggests that entrepreneurship in rural America is critical - his solution? Create a small-business and microenterprise initiative where investors can get a 20 percent tax credit for $50,000 investments in small businesses.

Nice but for startups. 

Require all employers to automatically enroll workers in 401(k)s or IRAs 

Nice but how does this HELP a small business? If anything it is additional administration and expense.

Keep the estate tax rate at 45% and increase the exemption limit to $3.5 million 

Love it, but how does it help the small business today?


McCain

Lower the corporate tax rate from 35% to 25% 

Immediate benefit. This is a positive

Wants to reduce the chances of taxes going up by requiring a three-fifths majority vote in Congress necessary to raise taxes 

Love it, keep the taxes from going up at a whim.

Allow small business owners to expense new equipment and technology purchases in their first year 

Good but again startup related.

Proposes creating a permanent ban on Internet taxes (states like New York and Texas are trying to push forward an Internet sales tax initiative) 

Ban on taxes good for reducing business adminstration.

Make the R&amp;D tax credit system permanent, but change the formula 

Same as above.  No benefits keeping the same thing going.

Wants to ban cellphone taxes (federal tax code states business people can only write off the portion of their cell phone bill that applies to business and not personal use) 

Helps small business save money.

Create a tax credit system to allow people to buy personal health insurance that they can take with them from job to job 

Great but more for the employee than employer.

Reduce the estate tax rate to 15% and increase the exemption limit to $5-10 million 

Great, but doesn&#039;t help the business today.


Compare both:.....
And looking at items that actually benefit the employer not employee.

It&#039;s really a 10% tax break against 50% credit on health benefits.

If I look at last years taxes it is a tight race.

As a small business owner I&#039;ll take the guaranteed 10%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets go line by line</p>
<p>The goal is to move the economy forward today</p>
<p>Obama</p>
<p>Increase the minimum wage and index the rate to inflation so that it goes up every year </p>
<p>This helps employees and costs small bussiness. &#8211; This is a negative to Small business</p>
<p>Wants to eliminate all capital gains taxes for new business start-ups </p>
<p>Great &#8211; But how does this help the economy today? 95% of small businesses fail in 3-5 years. We need to help the small businesses that exist today to grow. &#8211; This is good but not effective for results now.</p>
<p>Give a $500 credit to business owners to offset the self-employment tax </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take the $500, but if you own a small business how is $500 going to help you really?</p>
<p>Proposes making the R&amp;D tax credit system permanent.</p>
<p>While this is good, I dont know many small businesses wih R&amp;D.  This is not a change only to make permanent.</p>
<p>Give a 50% refundable credit for employee health insurance premiums that are paid by the employer </p>
<p>This is positive&#8230; for those that offer health benefits and motivates others to offer health benefits.</p>
<p>Suggests that entrepreneurship in rural America is critical &#8211; his solution? Create a small-business and microenterprise initiative where investors can get a 20 percent tax credit for $50,000 investments in small businesses.</p>
<p>Nice but for startups. </p>
<p>Require all employers to automatically enroll workers in 401(k)s or IRAs </p>
<p>Nice but how does this HELP a small business? If anything it is additional administration and expense.</p>
<p>Keep the estate tax rate at 45% and increase the exemption limit to $3.5 million </p>
<p>Love it, but how does it help the small business today?</p>
<p>McCain</p>
<p>Lower the corporate tax rate from 35% to 25% </p>
<p>Immediate benefit. This is a positive</p>
<p>Wants to reduce the chances of taxes going up by requiring a three-fifths majority vote in Congress necessary to raise taxes </p>
<p>Love it, keep the taxes from going up at a whim.</p>
<p>Allow small business owners to expense new equipment and technology purchases in their first year </p>
<p>Good but again startup related.</p>
<p>Proposes creating a permanent ban on Internet taxes (states like New York and Texas are trying to push forward an Internet sales tax initiative) </p>
<p>Ban on taxes good for reducing business adminstration.</p>
<p>Make the R&amp;D tax credit system permanent, but change the formula </p>
<p>Same as above.  No benefits keeping the same thing going.</p>
<p>Wants to ban cellphone taxes (federal tax code states business people can only write off the portion of their cell phone bill that applies to business and not personal use) </p>
<p>Helps small business save money.</p>
<p>Create a tax credit system to allow people to buy personal health insurance that they can take with them from job to job </p>
<p>Great but more for the employee than employer.</p>
<p>Reduce the estate tax rate to 15% and increase the exemption limit to $5-10 million </p>
<p>Great, but doesn&#8217;t help the business today.</p>
<p>Compare both:&#8230;..<br />
And looking at items that actually benefit the employer not employee.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really a 10% tax break against 50% credit on health benefits.</p>
<p>If I look at last years taxes it is a tight race.</p>
<p>As a small business owner I&#8217;ll take the guaranteed 10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Tilford</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-100426</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Tilford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-100426</guid>
		<description>Obama is the way to go.  I agree that it is the unregulated &quot;capitalism gone wild&quot; policies of the current administration that tanked this thing.  Of course there is blame on both sides but ultimately I think that ideaology is hurtful.  Capitalism absolutely needs restraints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is the way to go.  I agree that it is the unregulated &#8220;capitalism gone wild&#8221; policies of the current administration that tanked this thing.  Of course there is blame on both sides but ultimately I think that ideaology is hurtful.  Capitalism absolutely needs restraints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu b</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-98734</link>
		<dc:creator>stu b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-98734</guid>
		<description>I just started a small web design firm. From the proposals outlined here, Obama is a much more appealing canidate for a small startup like me. It seems that mccains policies are geared more towards big established businesses, not the little guys like me. Additionally, the employee support laws while taxing on me are something I would strive to implement  individually because it is what I believe to be the right thing to do.

Also, kamullis got it right about the recent bailouts... But I would like to add that both the public and private sectors have the same risk of failure and potential for harm. Becuase both sectors are subject to the same potential risks, the people themselves. If we don&#039;t want to see these things happen again, it is up to us as individuals to do the right thing and think about the ethical social and economic implications of our actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started a small web design firm. From the proposals outlined here, Obama is a much more appealing canidate for a small startup like me. It seems that mccains policies are geared more towards big established businesses, not the little guys like me. Additionally, the employee support laws while taxing on me are something I would strive to implement  individually because it is what I believe to be the right thing to do.</p>
<p>Also, kamullis got it right about the recent bailouts&#8230; But I would like to add that both the public and private sectors have the same risk of failure and potential for harm. Becuase both sectors are subject to the same potential risks, the people themselves. If we don&#8217;t want to see these things happen again, it is up to us as individuals to do the right thing and think about the ethical social and economic implications of our actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamullis</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-98131</link>
		<dc:creator>kamullis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-98131</guid>
		<description>hey curt... get your facts right. Freddy Mac and Fannie May were not government supported until they just got bailed out about a week ago.  before that they received none of our tax dollars.  it is actually unregulated free-market capitalism that has destroyed the economy, in-case you haven&#039;t been paying attention.  the government bailing out these investment giants is the closest we have ever come to socialism and if there had been more oversight and regulation over the outrageous lending and borrowing practices of these falling giants then we wouldn&#039;t be in this mess in the first place.  by the way social democracies in Europe have citizens that enjoy on average a higher standard of living then the average american.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey curt&#8230; get your facts right. Freddy Mac and Fannie May were not government supported until they just got bailed out about a week ago.  before that they received none of our tax dollars.  it is actually unregulated free-market capitalism that has destroyed the economy, in-case you haven&#8217;t been paying attention.  the government bailing out these investment giants is the closest we have ever come to socialism and if there had been more oversight and regulation over the outrageous lending and borrowing practices of these falling giants then we wouldn&#8217;t be in this mess in the first place.  by the way social democracies in Europe have citizens that enjoy on average a higher standard of living then the average american.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is &#34;The Bush Doctrine&#34;? - Page 5 - Forums - Islamica Community</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-97199</link>
		<dc:creator>What is &#34;The Bush Doctrine&#34;? - Page 5 - Forums - Islamica Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-97199</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reduce the estate tax rate to 15% and increase the exemption limit to $5-10 million source: YoungEntrepreneur.com Blog » Obama or McCain &#8211; Who is More Small Business Friendly?  McCain&#8217;s small business bunk FactCheck.org: McCain&#8217;s Small-Business Bunk  Obama&#8217;s plan for small business <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/SmallBusinessFINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/SmallBusinessFINAL.pdf</a>  The health care tax credit alone is a game changer.   McCain&#8217;s plan will definitely be good for corporations&#8230;..as it reduces their tax rates by 10%. It&#8217;s also thoroughly unrealistic as his vision for the economy doesn&#8217;t include any way too pay for the tax cuts he proposes. Alan Greenspan recently commented on exactly this&#8230;..the tax plan McCain proposes coupled with the massive spending he intends to pursue is a recipe for economic disaster (well&#8230;more like a continuation of an economic disaster &#8230;as Republicans are largely responsible for putting us here.)   Hey&#8230;..I understand that you have very real concerns as a small business owner and the reality is that your taxes may go up but where did you get the 10% figure you mentioned earlier?  EDIT: Never mind&#8230;..I thought you were talking about the 250-600k bracket&#8230;&#8230;.to reiterate&#8230;&#8230;the vast majority of small business owners are actually in this category and will see a 0% increase in tax rates&#8230;..those in the 600k-2million bracket will see an increase of roughly 8-11%.    __________________ &quot;Truly in the heart there is a void that can not be removed except with the company of Allah. And in it there is a sadness that can not be removed except with the happiness of knowing Allah and being true to Him. And in it there is an emptiness that can not be filled except with love for Him and by turning to Him and always remembering Him. And if a person were given all of the world and what is in it, it would not fill this emptiness.&quot; &#8212; Ibn Qayyim al Jawziyya       Last edited by dreamdeferred : Yesterday at 01:18 PM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is &#34;The Bush Doctrine&#34;? - Page 5 - Forums - Islamica Community</title>
		<link>http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-97087</link>
		<dc:creator>What is &#34;The Bush Doctrine&#34;? - Page 5 - Forums - Islamica Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngentrepreneur.com/blog/2008/09/10/obama-or-mccain-who-is-more-small-business-friendly/#comment-97087</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reduce the estate tax rate to 15% and increase the exemption limit to $5-10 million source: YoungEntrepreneur.com Blog » Obama or McCain &#8211; Who is More Small Business Friendly?  McCain&#8217;s small business bunk FactCheck.org: McCain&#8217;s Small-Business Bunk  Obama&#8217;s plan for small business <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/SmallBusinessFINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/SmallBusinessFINAL.pdf</a>  The health care tax credit alone is a game changer.   McCain&#8217;s plan will definitely be good for corporations&#8230;..as it reduces their tax rates by 10%. It&#8217;s also thoroughly unrealistic as his vision for the economy doesn&#8217;t include any way too pay for the tax cuts he proposes. Alan Greenspan recently commented on exactly this&#8230;..the tax plan McCain proposes coupled with the massive spending he intends to pursue is a recipe for economic disaster (well&#8230;more like economic disaster &quot;to be continued&quot;&#8230;as Republicans have already put us here.)    __________________ &quot;Truly in the heart there is a void that can not be removed except with the company of Allah. And in it there is a sadness that can not be removed except with the happiness of knowing Allah and being true to Him. And in it there is an emptiness that can not be filled except with love for Him and by turning to Him and always remembering Him. And if a person were given all of the world and what is in it, it would not fill this emptiness.&quot; &#8212; Ibn Qayyim al Jawziyya [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
